Back to results

Published · Karel Huk

01 / 04Online store for haberdashery with its own laser production

Same ad spend, 33% more revenue from ads.

+33%

ad revenue at the same spend

Starting point (took over on Apr 28, 2026)

  • For January to March 2026 the account reported a return of 3.32. The real figure was 1.66: every purchase had been counted twice from November 2025 to April 2026.
  • Over those six months that added up to 500,856 CZK in revenue that never existed.
  • A campaign on competitor names cost 5,944 CZK a month and brought not a single sale.

What I fixed

  1. Apr 29switched off the competitor campaign.
  2. May 21purchase tracking fixed, one purchase = one conversion.
  3. Jun 5new campaign structure built around margin, own production kept separate.
  4. Aug 13brought back 6,520 own-production products that had silently dropped out of ads after a category was renamed. Advertised products went from 1,532 to 7,645.

Result

Ad spend+0.64%
Jan–Mar 2026: 133,958 CZK, Jun–Aug 2026: 134,812 CZK
Revenue from ads+33.22%
Jan–Mar 2026: 222,349 CZK, Jun–Aug 2026: 296,205 CZK
Return on ad spend (ROAS)
Jan–Mar 2026: 1.66, Jun–Aug 2026: 2.20
Cost of sale (ad spend ÷ revenue)
Jan–Mar 2026: 60.25%, Jun–Aug 2026: 45.51%

From June to September, 23,775 CZK was not spent on the competitor campaign.

Compared periods: Jan–Mar 2026 vs Jun–Aug 2026

A note on the numbers: January to March revenue is corrected for the double-counted purchases. Winter months are seasonally stronger for this store, so the improvement is not explained by season.

07Contact

Want numbers like these on your account?

I reply within 24 hours. The call takes 30 minutes.

On the call I will tell you what I would fix first and whether it is worth doing at all.

This consultation is non-binding. By submitting, you agree to the processing of personal data.

Prefer to reach me directly?